Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 5,676
NOBLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05122
Petitioner: SHEAR NOBLES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TURNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05123
Petitioner: JAMES TURNER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BRIGHTWELL v. LANE et al
as 2:2016cv05103
Petitioner: ANTHONY JAMES BRIGHTWELL, JR.
Respondent: JAY LANE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KAMA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05124
Petitioner: KOURTNEY KAMA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MAJOR v. SUPERINTENDENT: CLERK et al
as 5:2016cv05106
Petitioner: EDWARD L. MAJOR
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT: CLERK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POWELL v. LINK et al
as 2:2016cv05085
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIKELL v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv05086
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VELEZ-MERCADO v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2016cv05082
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. MOONEY
as 2:2016cv05041
Respondent: MOONEY
Petitioner: GENE W. MILLER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. MAY et al
as 2:2016cv05004
Petitioner: JMAR M. HENDERSON
Respondent: G. MAY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?