Oregon Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Bowen v. Skillz Platform, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Derek Bowen
Defendant:
Skillz Platform, Inc., Andrew Paradise and Jason Roswig
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Davis v. Providence Health & Services - Oregon
as 3:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Carlee Davis
Defendant:
Providence Health & Services - Oregon and Providence Health & Services - Oregon a domestic nonprofit corporation doing business as Providence Seaside Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kauwe v. Sysco Portland, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jay Kauwe
Defendant:
Sysco Portland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Wu v. Oregon Health & Science University
as 3:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
N. Genevieve Wu
Defendant:
Oregon Health & Science University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Ayars v. AutoZone Parts, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01537
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ayars
Defendant:
AutoZone Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Boerger v. PCC Structurals, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01456
Plaintiff:
Brent Boerger
Defendant:
PCC Structurals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Parrott v. International Paper Company
as 3:2021cv01295
Plaintiff:
Mark S Parrott
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Bishop v. Portland State University, et al
as 3:2021cv00594
Plaintiff:
Jon Bishop
Defendant:
Antonio Recillas and Portland State University a public body doing business as University Place Hotel and Conference Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rock v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 3:2021cv00247
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rock
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Miller v. Prestige Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Homewoods Heights, LLC and Prestige Care, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dawn Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
