US District Court for the District of Oregon

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,323
Bell v. Cain et al
as 2:2021cv01555
Plaintiff: Floyd Wayne Bell
Defendant: Brad Cain, Dr. Garth Gulick, Dr. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zarghami v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv01550
Plaintiff: Lisa V. Zarghami
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Duhart v. VanHoose et al
as 3:2021cv01548
Plaintiff: RaShawd D. Duhart
Defendant: Christopher VanHoose and Clinton Weatherspoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elixir Therapeutics, LLC v. TNR HOLDING GROUP, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01553
Plaintiff: Elixir Therapeutics, LLC
Defendant: TNR HOLDING GROUP, Inc., PODS HEALTH, Inc., WAREHOUSE HOLDINGS, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1965
Type: Contract Insurance
Koshilka v. K1 Speed, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01552
Plaintiff: Irina Koshilka
Defendant: K1 Speed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jett v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01542
Plaintiff: Virginia M. Jett
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Doe v. Oregon State University et al
as 6:2021cv01541
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Oregon State University, Board of Trustees of Oregon State University, Kimberly Kirkland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Elixir Therapeutics, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01554
Defendant: Elixir Therapeutics, LLC, TNR HOLDING GROUP, Inc., PODS HEALTH, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Ehlers v. Brown
as 3:2021cv01549
Petitioner: Michelle Danielle Ehlers
Respondent: Nicole Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight v. Snake River Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01540
Plaintiff: Kyle Donovan Knight
Defendant: Snake River Corrections, Dept of Corrections and Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?