U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,883
Oravetz v. Lane County Oregon
as 6:2025cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Lane County Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Church v. United States Department Of Energy et al
as 3:2025cv00426
Plaintiff:
Dale W. Church
Defendant:
United States Department Of Energy, Chris Wright and Bonneville Power Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McAllister v. Goldsby et al
as 6:2025cv00406
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michael McAllister
Defendant:
Caleb Goldsby, Justin Peckels and J. Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. State of Oregon
as 3:2025cv00409
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Turner
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendricks et al v. Guardian Management LLC et al
as 3:2025cv00413
Plaintiff:
Kim Hendricks and Ladonna Richardson
Defendant:
Guardian Management LLC and Rockwood 10 Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gaskey v. Washington
as 6:2025cv00399
Plaintiff:
Camila Gaskey
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Lisa Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaskey v. Juhas
as 6:2025cv00401
Plaintiff:
Camila Gaskey
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Mark A. Juhas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Milwaukie MH&RV Park et al
as 3:2025cv00398
Plaintiff:
Anthony Young
Defendant:
Milwaukie MH&RV Park and Murphy Law Group P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
