US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 7,462
Cannon v. Landers et al
as 6:2019cv00425
Defendant: Curtis Landers, Russell, Gainer
Plaintiff: David Lee Cannon
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. USA
as 3:2019cv00411
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Byron Van Branch, Jr
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Anderson v. Wrightson
as 2:2019cv00408
Defendant: Kash Wrightson
Plaintiff: William James Anderson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Oregon State Hospital et al
as 6:2019cv00409
Defendant: S.U.P.T., Oregon State Hospital, Delores Matteucci
Plaintiff: Victoria Elizabeth Barba Hill
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Pierce County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2019cv00406
Defendant: Pierce County Sheriffs Department, Naphcare Healthcare
Plaintiff: William James Matthew Wallace, II
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Follstad-Martin v. Naphcare at Washington County Jail
as 3:2019cv00403
Defendant: Naphcare at Washington County Jail
Plaintiff: Jonathan Derry Follstad-Martin
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Fourstar v. Hurwitz et al
as 3:2019cv00400
Defendant: Hugh J. Hurwitz, Rod Rosenstein, Josias Salazar
Plaintiff: Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barker v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
as 3:2019cv00404
Respondent: Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
Petitioner: Duwane Roy Barker
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2019cv00386
Plaintiff: Willie J. Walker
Defendant: Det. Shopp, Deputy Anthony Titus, Jackson County and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Andrews v. Bowser
as 2:2019cv00387
Respondent: Troy Bowser
Petitioner: Shawn Lee Andrews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?