US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,679
MEADOW COMMONS OWNER, LLC v. Continental Casualty Company
as 3:2025cv00053
Plaintiff:
MEADOW COMMONS OWNER, LLC
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Rosetti et al v. Aerolineas Argentinas, SA
as 3:2025cv00048
Defendant:
Aerolineas Argentinas, SA
Plaintiff:
Alexa Rosetti and Karl D. Shehu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Brown v. Carington Mortgage Services
as 3:2025cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ralston Brown
Defendant:
Carington Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dial v. Metro-North Railroad Company
as 3:2025cv00047
Plaintiff:
Tulani Dial
Defendant:
Metro-North Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Umbarger v. Target Stores, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00049
Defendant:
Target Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trina K. Umbarger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mihalick v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00052
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carol Mihalick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jylkka v. Colvin
as 3:2025cv00044
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Alexis C Jylkka
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
In re: Power of Attorney for Berkley Insurance Company
as 3:2025mc00004
Unknown:
Power of Attorney
Interested Party:
Marissa Titus
Cause Of Action: Power of Attorney
In re: Power of Attorney for XL Specialty Insurance Company
as 3:2025mc00005
Unknown:
Power of Attorney
Interested Party:
Marissa Titus
Cause Of Action: Power of Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
