US District Court for the District of Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,834
Rashid v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Master Rashid
Defendant:
Pierce, Blackstock, Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rashid v. Broadley et al
as 3:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
Master Rashid
Defendant:
Deborah Broadley, Richard Williams and Debra Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01236
Petitioner:
Franklin Robinson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Candelaria v. Tompkins
as 3:2023cv01226
Petitioner:
Shakira Candelaria
Respondent:
Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Candelaria v. Tompkins
as 3:2023cv01231
Petitioner:
Shakira Candelaria
Respondent:
Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Bowers, Nickols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snowden v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Maurice Snowden
Defendant:
John Doe, Blackstock, Anthony Carrasquillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dull v. Commissioner of Correction
as 3:2023cv01220
Petitioner:
Nathan G Dull
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. USA
as 3:2023cv01199
Petitioner:
John Matthews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gawlik v. Reis et al
as 3:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jan M. Gawlik
Defendant:
Jennifer Reis, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
