Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 380
Pierce v. DVD II Group, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jesse Pierce
Defendant:
DVD II Group, LLC doing business as Options Travel Group and P.M.A. Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ortman v. Asurion Insurance Services, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00038
Defendant:
Asurion Insurance Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Ortman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Robin Noe v. Abbott Laboratories Inc.
as 2:2025cv00001
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robin Noe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bell et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01416
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bell, Jared Brown, Jeff Burgess and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Hurley v. TRI Tanning, LLC
as 2:2024cv00212
Defendant:
TRI Tanning, LLC
Plaintiff:
Megan S Hurley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Gill v. Bonded Filter Co., LLC
as 3:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Gill
Defendant:
Bonded Filter Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Noland v. Tennessee Pediatrics, P.C.
as 3:2024cv01358
Defendant:
Tennessee Pediatrics, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Noland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Mathis-Sanders v. Greyhound Lines Inc.
as 2:2024cv02868
Plaintiff:
Kimla Mathis-Sanders
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Mathavong v. Yates Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01254
Plaintiff:
Suriya Bryson Mathavong
Defendant:
Yates Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Parker v. Dogwood Animal Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Defendant:
Scruffy City Animal Hospital and Dogwood Animal Hospital
Plaintiff:
Paxton Parker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
