U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Richie v. MHM Health Professionals, LLC
as 3:2025cv00467
Plaintiff:
William Richie, M.D.
Defendant:
MHM Health Professionals, LLC doing business as Centurion
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hull v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00352
Plaintiff:
Josh Hull
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Pierce v. DVD II Group, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jesse Pierce
Defendant:
DVD II Group, LLC doing business as Options Travel Group and P.M.A. Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ortman v. Asurion Insurance Services, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00038
Defendant:
Asurion Insurance Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Ortman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Bell et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01416
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bell, Jared Brown, Jeff Burgess and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Gill v. Bonded Filter Co., LLC
as 3:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Gill
Defendant:
Bonded Filter Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Noland v. Tennessee Pediatrics, P.C.
as 3:2024cv01358
Defendant:
Tennessee Pediatrics, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Noland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Mathavong v. Yates Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01254
Plaintiff:
Suriya Bryson Mathavong
Defendant:
Yates Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Perry v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Sara Perry
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rumfelt v. Humphreys County
as 3:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Tammy Rumfelt
Defendant:
Humphreys County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
