Denmark v. Saint Thomas Medical Partners
| Lori Denmark |
| Saint Thomas Medical Partners |
| 3:2022cv00289 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Elise Hofer McKelvey admitted to this court. (mg) |
Filing 19
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 9/1/2022. Discovery due by 3/1/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 5/5/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 6/9/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Elise Hofer McKelvey on behalf of Saint Thomas Medical Partners (McKelvey, Elise) |
| Filing 17 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Saint Thomas Medical Partners. (Stevens, C.) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Saint Thomas Medical Partners.(Stevens, C.) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone held on 6/1/2022; ORDER to enter. (Tape #not recorded.) (Hearing lasted :29)(jwc) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 6/1/2022. (bs)
|
| Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Saint Thomas Medical Partners. (Attachments: #1 Attachment (Proposed) Agreed Order)(Stevens, C.) |
| Filing 13 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (JOINT) filed by Saint Thomas Medical Partners. (Stevens, C.) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for C. Eric Stevens admitted to this court. (mg) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by C. Eric Stevens on behalf of Saint Thomas Medical Partners (Stevens, C.) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed by Lori Denmark. Saint Thomas Medical Partners served on 4/25/2022. (Biesecker, Kyle) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 4/25/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 6/1/2022 at 03:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (Due to Judge Trauger's recusal, the Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/30/2022 at 02:00 PM has been terminated.) (mg) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF RECUSAL: I hereby recuse myself in this case. The file shall be returned to the Clerk for reassignment to another judge. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/22/2022. (Note: Case randomly reassigned to District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr by the Clerk's Office for all further proceedings.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 7 ***DISREGARD, CASE REASSIGNED*** NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/30/2022 at 02:00 PM in Chambers 825 before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. (mg) Modified on 4/22/2022 (mg). |
| Filing 6 Summons issued as to Saint Thomas Medical Partners. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (mg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Frederick Biesecker on behalf of Lori Denmark. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Saint Thomas Medical Partners (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3580253), filed by Lori Denmark. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Kyle Frederick Biesecker admitted to this court. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Denmark v. Saint Thomas Medical Partners | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lori Denmark | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Frederick Biesecker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Saint Thomas Medical Partners | |
| Represented By: | C. Eric Stevens |
| Represented By: | Elise Hofer McKelvey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
