Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 771
ALMADA v. WURZAK HOTEL GROUP MARK, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv01205
Plaintiff:
DIANA ALMADA
Defendant:
WURZAK HOTEL GROUP MARK, LLC doing business as WURZAK HOTEL GROUP and WURZAK HOTEL AND SHERATON VALLEY FORGE HOTEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Criscuoli v. Abeloff Auto Group, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00343
Plaintiff:
Carl Criscuoli
Defendant:
Abeloff Auto Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
NICHOLLS v. MAIN LINE HEALTHCARE
as 2:2025cv00987
Plaintiff:
LASHIMA NICHOLLS
Defendant:
MAIN LINE HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)2(a) Family and Medical Leave Act
Rawling v. Walmart
as 2:2025cv00996
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Rawling
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)2(a) Family and Medical Leave Act
BIONDY v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION t/a CONGOLEUM FLOORING
as 2:2025cv00653
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BIONDY
Defendant:
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Delp v. Hexcel Corporation
as 3:2025cv00233
Plaintiff:
Russell Delp
Defendant:
Hexcel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Smith v. Central Dauphin School District
as 1:2025cv00213
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
Central Dauphin School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Moses v. Voith US Inc.
as 1:2025cv00188
Plaintiff:
Tracey Moses
Defendant:
Voith US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Toro v. Community Progress Council, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00179
Plaintiff:
Delia Tomassini Toro and Delia Stephan
Defendant:
Community Progress Council, Inc. and Linda Spoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRIMES v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GRIMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
