Eighth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 695
Langer v. GL SHH, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Defendant:
Daniel Boettcher, GL SHH, LLC doing business as Stew Hansen Hyundai, Ken Garff Automotive, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Langer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 FMLA: Leave Requirements
McKenzie v. National Park College
as 6:2024cv06096
Plaintiff:
Kenita McKenzie
Defendant:
National Park College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hardnett v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Brandy Hardnett
Defendant:
Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walker v. Trustile Doors, LLC
as 3:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Becky Walker
Defendant:
Trustile Doors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Family and Medical Leave Act
LeClair v. Innovative Certified Technical Plating, L.L.C.
as 0:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn LeClair
Defendant:
Innovative Certified Technical Plating, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Collins v. City of Lowell, Arkansas
as 5:2024cv05122
Plaintiff:
Christopher Collins
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fox v. Pepsi Midamerica Co.
as 6:2024cv03161
Plaintiff:
Cody Fox
Defendant:
Pepsi Midamerica Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Villaume v. iTrade Network, Inc.
as 0:2024cv02005
Plaintiff:
Allie Villaume
Defendant:
iTrade Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Malic v. Lennox Industries, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Adin Malic
Defendant:
Lennox Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parker v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 8:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Josh Parker
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
