Kansas Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Guzan v. NFI Apartment Management, LLC
as 2:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Guzan
Defendant:
NFI Apartment Management, LLC
Ross v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02537
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ross
Defendant:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Cook v. Newton Healthcare Corporation
as 6:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Keziah Cook
Defendant:
Newton Healthcare Corporation and Newton Healthcare Corporation doing business as NMC Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Atkins v. Unique Metal Fabrications, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02446
Plaintiff:
Ricky Atkins
Defendant:
Unique Metal Fabrications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Chapman v. Lowen Corporation
as 2:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Lowen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Rogers v. Stryten Energy
as 6:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Carlis Rogers
Defendant:
Stryten Engery and Stryten Energy
Watson v. Kansas, State of, Department for Children and Families
as 5:2023cv04042
Plaintiff:
Shayne A Watson and Shayne A. Watson
Defendant:
State of Kansas Department for Children and Families and Kansas, State of, Department for Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ward v. Wesley Medical Center, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
William Oscar Ward
Defendant:
Wesley Medical Center, LLC and HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
O'Dell v. Anixter, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. O'Dell
Defendant:
Anixter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Sanford v. Humana, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02048
Plaintiff:
Veronica Sanford
Defendant:
Humana, Inc. doing business as Humana at Home, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
