US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,242
Bingham v. Butt et al
as 2:2025cv00054
Defendant:
Carl Millender, Lemniscata Capital LLC and Irm Fareen Butt
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Poff v. Scullion et al
as 2:2025cv00049
Defendant:
Sgt Mezzenette, Capt Esser, Capt Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Poff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Hoch et al
as 2:2025cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Porter
Defendant:
Christopher Hoch, Kelsey Stone and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bone v. Colvin
as 2:2025cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Bone
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ward et al v. United Healthcare Services Inc on behalf of UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
as 2:2025cv00045
Intervenor:
Moreland OB-GYN Associates SC
Plaintiff:
ProHealth Waukesha Memorial Hospital and Amanda E Ward
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services Inc on behalf of UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Petersen v. Colvin
as 2:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
Ami L Petersen
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Olrich v. Noble
as 2:2025cv00046
Petitioner:
Jason Allen Olrich
Respondent:
Capt Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
