US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,603
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ADA - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd et al v. City of Kenosha et al
as 2:2024cv00919
Defendant:
Yanbas, LLC, James Karaway, City of Kenosha and others
Plaintiff:
Shanya Boyd and T.T., a minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv00918
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Janet Morris, Michael Marcucci and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BREG Pike River Development Inc et al v. City of Racine et al
as 2:2024cv00909
Defendant:
Mayor Cory Mason, City of Racine and Village of Mount Pleasant
Plaintiff:
BREG Pike River Development Inc and BREG Pike River LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
