Tenth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 438
Barnett v. ANB Bank
as 1:2023cv02449
Plaintiff:
Hilary Barnett
Defendant:
ANB Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hunt-Brown v. New Mexico General Sevices Department et al
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hunt-Brown
Defendant:
New Mexico General Sevices Department, Valerie Paulk, Eunice Moya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Chapman v. Lowen Corporation
as 2:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Lowen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Sullivan v. Regus Management Group, LLC
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sullivan
Defendant:
Regus Management Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1612 - FMLA: Leave Requirements
Rogers v. Stryten Energy
as 6:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Carlis Rogers
Defendant:
Stryten Engery and Stryten Energy
Watson v. Kansas, State of, Department for Children and Families
as 5:2023cv04042
Plaintiff:
Shayne A Watson and Shayne A. Watson
Defendant:
State of Kansas Department for Children and Families and Kansas, State of, Department for Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Cohagen v. Elk City Public School
as 5:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Alicia Cohagen
Defendant:
Elk City Public School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Ward v. Wesley Medical Center, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
William Oscar Ward
Defendant:
Wesley Medical Center, LLC and HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Myers v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Micah Myers
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave Act
Springer v. Tulsack, LLC
as 4:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Haylie Springer
Defendant:
Tulsack, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
