Tenth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 489
McGuinness v. Sysco USA II LLC
as 5:2025cv00640
Plaintiff:
Bishop McGuinness
Defendant:
Sysco USA II LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Lidgett v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2025cv02297
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Lidgett
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Cookson v. Breeze Aviation Group Inc
as 1:2025cv00070
Plaintiff:
Rachael Cookson
Defendant:
Breeze Aviation Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave
Shupe v. Biomereiux
as 2:2025cv00368
Plaintiff:
Cheltsy Shupe
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Combs v. Hoover et al
as 5:2025cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jovanna Combs
Defendant:
Venita Hoover, Oklahoma County Law Library, Board of Law Library Trustees of Oklahoma County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Farrell v. Paychex Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00324
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Farrell
Defendant:
Paychex Inc. and Paychex North America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave
Leven v. SHI International, Corp.
as 1:2025cv01134
Plaintiff:
Todd Leven
Defendant:
SHI International, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1612 - FMLA: Leave Requirements
Boxum v. Tokyo Electron America

as 1:2025cv00345
Plaintiff:
Jason Boxum
Defendant:
Tokyo Electron America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mamer v. Fuego Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2025cv01089
Plaintiff:
Lexi Mamer
Defendant:
Fuego Holdings LLC a foreign corporation doing business as Attic Salt and Calendar Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Harris v. Hurricane Valley Fire Special Service District et al
as 4:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Steven Harris
Defendant:
Hurricane Valley Fire Special Service District, Joseph Decker and Kohl Furley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.