Tenth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 458
Newbold v. HealthEquity, et al
as 23-4043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN NEWBOLD
Defendant / Appellee:
HEALTHEQUITY, INC., JON KESSLER, in his official and individual capacity, LAURIE LEHMAN, in her official and individual capacity and others
O'Dell v. Anixter, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. O'Dell
Defendant:
Anixter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Singh v. Northwood Hospitality LLC
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Namrta Singh
Defendant:
Northwood Hospitality LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Sanford v. Humana, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02048
Plaintiff:
Veronica Sanford
Defendant:
Humana, Inc. doing business as Humana at Home, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Rivera v. Xerox Corporation
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Patricia Rivera
Defendant:
Xerox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Waite v. Eduro Healthcare, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Lisa Waite
Defendant:
Eduro Healthcare, LLC, Cabezon Nursing and Rehab, LLC, Joseph Foxwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McCause v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
Ada McCause
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Toth v. USD 234 Fort Scott et al
as 2:2022cv02452
Plaintiff:
Amber Toth
Defendant:
USD 234 Fort Scott and Ted Hessong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Coates v. Propio LS, LLC
as 2:2022cv02419
Defendant:
Propio LS, LLC and Propio Language Services
Plaintiff:
Crystal Coates
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Daggs v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Jade Daggs
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, Charles Kerr, Ronnie Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
