Tenth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 458
Smith v. MycoTechnology, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03453
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith
Defendant:
MycoTechnology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Romero-Valdez v. Parnall Law Firm, LLC
as 1:2023cv01084
Counter Defendant:
Dominique Romero-Valdez
Counter Claimant:
Parnall Law Firm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ross v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02537
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ross
Defendant:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Bolen v. MHM Support Services et al
as 5:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Kristy Bolen
Defendant:
MHM Support Services and Chris Carter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Cook v. Newton Healthcare Corporation
as 6:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Keziah Cook
Defendant:
Newton Healthcare Corporation and Newton Healthcare Corporation doing business as NMC Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Wright v. Independent School District No. I-007 of Seminole County, Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00384
Defendant:
Independent School District No. I-007 of Seminole County, Oklahoma and Varnum Public Schools
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
De La Paz v. Three Crosses Regional Hospital, LLC
as 2:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Jennifer De La Paz
Defendant:
Three Crosses Regional Hospital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Travis v. DentalQore LLC
as 2:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Caelen A. Travis and Caelen Travis
Defendant:
DentalQore LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave
Atkins v. Unique Metal Fabrications, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02446
Plaintiff:
Ricky Atkins
Defendant:
Unique Metal Fabrications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Barnett v. ANB Bank
as 1:2023cv02449
Plaintiff:
Hilary Barnett
Defendant:
ANB Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
