Eastern District of Oklahoma Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,529
McElhaney v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2018cv00193
Petitioner:
Albert McElhaney
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruner v. Bellamy
as 6:2018cv00190
Plaintiff:
Annie Bruner
Defendant:
Andrew Bellamy
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Teel v. United States of America
as 6:2018cv00189
Plaintiff:
Robert Teel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Cox-Graham v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Angela Cox-Graham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Armstrong v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Armstrong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Janelle Pearl Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. Cobb et al
as 6:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
Richard Douglas Hill
Defendant:
Officer Cobb, Officer Schmitt, Unknown Okmulgee County Jail Male Nurse
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bedford et al v. Nowlin et al
as 6:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
William Scott Bedford , Ray H. Pace , Sondra N. Pace
Defendant:
Mary Nowlin, Helen and Mary Nowlin Irrevocable Common Law Trust Dated February 28, 1927
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Tiffin v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Malissa K. Tiffin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
White v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sara Maxine White
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
