US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,873
Masters v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jesse R. Masters
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Samuels v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Samuels
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gilreath v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Howard Gilreath
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Parker et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00121
Plaintiff:
Joana Parker, Ed Parker
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon, Inc.
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Ritter v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00120
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Ritter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
St. Clair v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00119
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Debra K. St. Clair
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brown v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mary Gene Brown
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Trawick Construction Company, LLC v. United Fire & Casualty Company et al
as 6:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Utility Cable Communications, Inc., United Fire & Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Trawick Construction Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. USA
as 6:2019cv00116
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Leon Johnson
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Goldsborough v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00114
Plaintiff:
Monte P. Goldsborough
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
