US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,040
White v. Miller
as 6:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Headrick v. David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center
as 6:2024cv00323
Defendant:
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Headrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Born v. USA
as 6:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Kalup Allen Born
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McVicker v. Tuggle
as 6:2024cv00314
Respondent:
Terry Tuggle
Petitioner:
Keith Edward McVicker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Eufaula, City of et al.
as 6:2024cv00315
Defendant:
City of Eufaula, et al., Trent Casinger and Timothy Bryan
Plaintiff:
Ervin Ray Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damron v. Choctaw Nation
as 6:2024cv00313
Defendant:
Kara Bacon and Choctaw Nation
Plaintiff:
Damon Lee Damron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00308
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Petitioner:
Joseph Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrell v. Harpe
as 6:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Robert Chavelle Ferrell
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Tuggle
as 6:2024cv00302
Petitioner:
Corey Devon Nelson
Respondent:
Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacosse v. Muskogee County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv00297
Defendant:
Muskogee County Sheriff's Office, Muskogee County Jail and Correctional Officer James
Plaintiff:
Justin Todd Lacosse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
