U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 895
Simpson v. Tuggle et al
as 6:2025cv00085
Petitioner:
Michael Laroy Simpson
Respondent:
Terry Tuggle and Michael Whitmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gray v. Bridges
as 6:2025cv00067
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. Harpe
as 6:2025cv00063
Petitioner:
Joshua V Dunlap
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kolosha v. United States
as 6:2025cv00061
Petitioner:
Vitaly Kolosha
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Eslinger v. Harding
as 6:2025cv00042
Petitioner:
Rocky J. Eslinger
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peoples v. Davis
as 6:2025cv00041
Petitioner:
Matthew Earl Jason Peoples
Respondent:
Kelly Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harrison v. Oklahoma, State of
as 6:2025cv00018
Petitioner:
Walter Henry Harrison, III
Respondent:
Oklahoma, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Rankins
as 6:2025cv00004
Respondent:
Christopher Rankins
Petitioner:
Raymond Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farris v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00504
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and David Louthan
Petitioner:
Tyrone Leslie Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Holden v. Quick
as 6:2024cv00494
Respondent:
Christie Quick
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Allen Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
