US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 864
Sutton v. McClendon
as 6:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Joshua Lamont Sutton
Respondent:
Frankie McClendon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
St. Clair v. Quick
as 6:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Michael St. Clair
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutton v. McClendon
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Joshua Lamont Sutton
Respondent:
Frankie McClendon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanz-Carver v. Oklahoma County District Court
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Kyle Sanz-Carver
Respondent:
Oklahoma County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurst v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00209
Petitioner:
Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Rick Williams and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danderson v. Chennault et al
as 6:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Chad Raylee Danderson
Defendant:
Jason Chennault, Claremore Police Department, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Long v. Sweat
as 6:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Natasha Nicole Long
Respondent:
Christe Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Milton D. Grayson, Jr.
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
