US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 857
Butler v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00385
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wright
Respondent:
Gentre Drummond and Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nicholson v. Hamilton
as 6:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Bryan Douglas Nicholson
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joice v. Rogers
as 6:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
Brian Fredrick Joice
Respondent:
Mike Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Trotter v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Jared M Trotter and Jared M. Trotter
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
St. Clair v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Michael St. Clair
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith-Shuman v. Pittsburg County
as 6:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Alice M. Smith-Shuman
Respondent:
Pittsburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00318
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Ray
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LeBlanc v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Charles Leslie LeBlanc
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ivey v. Tuggle
as 6:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
Douglas Edward Ivey and Ronnie Gilmore
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
