U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 23,452
United States v. Gabourel
as 16-6227
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: LARENZO MONTEL GABOUREL
United States v. Grant
as 16-6228
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WESLEY TAVION GRANT
Brecek & Young Advisors v. Lloyds London Syndicate 2003
as 16-3245
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRECEK & YOUNG ADVISORS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: LLOYDS OF LONDON SYNDICATE 2003
Type: Contract Insurance
United States v. Murphy
as 16-5118
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BRYAN JAMES MURPHY
Webb v. Scott, et al
as 16-4134
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY SCOTT, Police Officer for Ogden City Police Department, FNU MURRAY, Police Officer at Ogden City Police Department, TERRY L. THOMPSON, Sheriff for Weber County and others
Defendant: FNU GATES, Correctional Officer at Weber County Correctional Facility
United States v. Cantu
as 16-2191
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RUBEN CANTU
Wilson v. Falk, et al
as 16-1310
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRANCE D. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee: FRANCES FALK, SHERWIN PHILLIPS, STEPHEN FRANK and others
United States v. Reeves
as 16-1311
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JEROD M. REEVES
Clasen v. NOVA Southeastern University, et al
as 16-1312
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT J. CLASEN
Defendant - Appellee: NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC., THOMAS I. PANZA, General Legal Counsel, Nova Southeastern University, Inc. in his individual capacity, GEORGE HANBURY, II, President and CEO, Sotheastern University, Inc. in his official capacity and others
United States v. Mirabal
as 16-2188
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GABRIEL MIRABAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?