US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,872
Lamar OCI North, LLC v. Charter Township of Garfield
as 1:2024cv00755
Defendant:
Charter Township of Garfield
Plaintiff:
Lamar OCI North, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gant v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00754
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Eric Gant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lamar OCI North, LLC v. East Bay, Charter Township of
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Lamar OCI North, LLC
Defendant:
East Bay, Charter Township of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00759
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Michelle v. Poulin
as 1:2024cv00757
Petitioner:
Monaco Michelle
Respondent:
Michael J. Poulin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilks v. Goldthorpe Enterprises, Inc
as 2:2024cv00124
Defendant:
Goldthorpe Enterprises, Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nessel v. Darby Winery, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Darby Winery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
Cole v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 1:2024cv00749
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Andrews #612980 v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00752
Defendant:
Unknown Smith, Unknown Gregory, Unknown Burkett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Andrews #612980
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
