US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Cases 31 - 40 of 32,548
Herron v. Unknown Fountain et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Eric Herron
Defendant:
Michael Schafer, Unknown Fountain, T. Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Kerwin v. Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital
as 1:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Kerwin
Respondent:
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital
Arcello v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Francis Arcello
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hickey v. Stump et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Kainte Hickey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Stump, Correctional Officer Nelson, Correctional Officer Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Wyoming, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Les Paul Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Wyoming, City of, Unknown Party #1 and Anastasia Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights-Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Perry #775224 v. King
as 1:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Perry #775224
Respondent:
Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels #657826 v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and Unknown Collinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
