Roberts v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
| Joseph Lee Roberts |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Co. |
| 4:2024cv01264 |
| July 24, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on October 1, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. in Chambers 16B before Judge J. Philip Calabrese. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on August 16, 2024. #1 Rule 26(f) Report of the Parties) (Y,A). |
| Filing 7 Answer and Affirmative Defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (Clements, Scott) Modified text on 8/16/2024 (L,MI). |
| Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by J. Lawson Johnston filed by on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Co.. (Johnston, J.) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation, Other Affiliate Norfolk Southern Properties, inc., Other Affiliate General American Insurance Company, Other Affiliate NS Fiber Optics, Inc., Other Affiliate Thoroughbred Technology & Telecommunications, LLC for Norfolk Southern Railway Co. filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Co.. (Clements, Scott) |
| Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Scott D. Clements filed by on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Co.. (Clements, Scott) |
| Filing 3 Affidavit of Service by personal service executed upon Norfolk Southern Railway Co. on 7/25/2024, filed on behalf of Joseph Lee Roberts (Related document(s) #1 , #2 ) (Rapier, Michael). Modified on 8/1/2024 to note Exhibits - Pictures, uploaded with main document (H,SP) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,Ju) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Norfolk Southern Railway Co. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12661159. Filed by Joseph Lee Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Rapier, Michael) |
| Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (D,Ju) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (D,Ju) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roberts v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Co. | |
| Represented By: | Scott D. Clements |
| Represented By: | J. Lawson Johnston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Lee Roberts | |
| Represented By: | Michael T. Rapier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
