US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,614
Mercado v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10423
Plaintiff: Leslie Mercado
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chaves v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv10429
Plaintiff: Angela Chaves
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10417
Plaintiff: Jamile C Smith
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Arrington v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv10371
Plaintiff: Michael D. Arrington
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tambolleo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv10347
Plaintiff: Jason Steven Tambolleo
Defendant: Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Duran v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10263
Plaintiff: Miguelina Duran
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rochester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv10210
Plaintiff: James Henry Rochester
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Boyle v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10198
Plaintiff: Renee Lorraine Boyle
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sands v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv10185
Plaintiff: Michael Charles Sands
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv30016
Plaintiff: Marta Ortiz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?