First Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Miller v. Najmi et al
as 1:2026cv00529
Plaintiff:
Chloe Miller
Defendant:
Ali Najmi and Kevin Mcclanahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Warner v. Perry et al
as 1:2026cv00525
Plaintiff:
Branden Warner
Defendant:
Connor Perry and Nashua, NH, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodham v. Conway Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv00528
Plaintiff:
Grace Woodham
Defendant:
Conway Police Department and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Torres-Lopez v. Mendoza et al
as 3:2026cv01409
Plaintiff:
Sandra E. Torres
Defendant:
Ramon M. Mendoza, Leticia Pabon and Exel Joel Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tariri et al v. Kluft et al
as 1:2026cv12897
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Tariri
Defendant:
David Kluft, Andrea Campbell, Steven Tomkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez-Soler et al v. Gonzalez-Falcon et al
as 3:2026cv01413
Plaintiff:
Jose Gabriel Perez-Soler, Ana Awilda Soler-Nieves and Jose Ismael Perez-Nieves
Defendant:
Joseph Gonzalez-Falcon, Antonio Lopez-Figueroa, Jose Ramirez-Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Okogun v. Marshall Middle School et al
as 1:2026cv12876
Plaintiff:
Reuben Okogen
Defendant:
Marshall Middle School and Massachusetts Department of Children and Families
Cause Of Action: JS 44 Sec. IV - no matching citation currently in database
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv12862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Miller v. Najimi et al
as 1:2026cv12858
Plaintiff:
Chloe Miller
Defendant:
Ali Najimi and Kevin Mcclanahan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
