First Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Albright v. Lanier et al
as 1:2026cv00681
Plaintiff:
Brenda Albright
Defendant:
Sgt James Lanier and Patrol Woman Hannah Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ramos v. Schultz, et al
as 26-2075
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA M. RAMOS
Defendant:
GORDON N. SCHULTZ, individually and doing business as Schultz & Co., DUANE G. SULLIVAN, in the capacity as court appointed receiver, JOHANNA RAMOS SMOOT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hebert et al v. Five Circle Property Management, Inc., et al
as 1:2026cv14341
Plaintiff:
David K Hebert, Tanya Hebert and Cameron Rodrigues
Defendant:
Five Circle Property Management, Inc., Braley Woods Condominium Trust, Janek Property Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Eleyi v. Feng Kenneth An et al
as 1:2026cv13420
Plaintiff:
Ms. Rebecca J. Eleyi
Defendant:
Feng Kenneth An, Krystyna Drozd, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
