District Court Cases in Rhode Island
Cases 1 - 10 of 15,793
Stone v. North Providence et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Defendant:
Town of North Providence and North Providence Police Pension Board
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Munir v. Suttell
as 1:2024cv00359
Defendant:
Paul A Suttell
Plaintiff:
Hasim Munir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pope et al v. Mollicone, III et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Defendant:
AIRBNB Payments, Inc., AIRBNB, Inc. and Joseph Mollicone, III
Plaintiff:
DC Tamsin Pope and Thomas Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ware et al v. Cranston Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Michael Traficante, Sara Tindall-Woodman, Superintendent Jeannine Nota-Masse and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello and Rachel Ware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mello v. WPRI Media Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Defendant:
WPRI Media Inc, Shannon Hegy, Mike Montecalvo and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mello v. Cranston School District et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Defendant:
Major Todd Patalano, Cranston School District, Paul Olszewski and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mello v. The Providence Journal et al
as 1:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello
Defendant:
The Providence Journal, Jack Perry and Amy Russo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davidson v. Leshinsky Finance, LLC
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Bruce Cameron Davidson
Defendant:
Leshinsky Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
