U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,233
Scottsdale Capital Advisors, et al v. The Deal, LLC, et al
as 17-1968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTTSDALE CAPITAL ADVISORS CORP., JOHN HURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
THE DEAL, LLC, WILLIAM MEAGHER
Keach v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.
as 17-1912
Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES KEACH, solely in his capacity as the trustee for Montreal Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd.
Debtor:
MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD
Appellee:
WHEELING & LAKE ERIE RAILWAY COMPANY
Lopez-Lopez v. Sessions
as 17-1907
Petitioner:
RONY LOPEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III
Hiam v. Homeaway.com, Inc.
as 17-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER HIAM
Plaintiff:
BROOKE HUTCHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMEAWAY.COM, INC.
Adams v. Campo, et al
as 17-1835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD KENNETH ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE CAMPO, PAUL CAMPO
Wescott v. Zenk
as 17-1833
Petitioner:
RICHARD R. WESCOTT
Respondent:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden, NH State Prison
Interested Party:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Oquendo-Lorenzo, et al v. Hospital San Antonio, Inc.
as 17-1810
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JESSICA OQUENDO-LORENZO, personally and on behalf of her conjugal partnership with Rolando Lopez Montanez, ROLANDO LOPEZ-MONTANEZ, personally and on behalf on his conjugal partnership with Jessica Oquendo Lorenzo
Defendant - Appellant:
HOSPITAL SAN ANTONIO, INC., or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital San Antonio
Defendant - Appellee:
OSVALDO QUILES-GIOVANNETTI, NATIONAL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO, MARKETFORM NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF MID AMERICA
and others
Mariano v. US
as 17-1834
Petitioner - Appellant:
RALPH M. MARIANO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Adams v. Cranston, RI, et al
as 17-1836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD KENNETH ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRANSTON, RI, CRANSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
