U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 17,233
Lath v. Dufresne, et al
as 17-1826
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANJEEV LATH
Defendant - Appellee: GERARD DUFRESNE, BETTY MULLEN, OAK BROOK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Oak Brook Associates
Defendant: CHERYL VALLEE, PERRY VALLEE, WILLIAM QUINN MOREY and others
Interested Party: JARED DUFRESNE, NH EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, NEW HAMPSHIRE UNION LEADER and others
Jimenez-Tapia, et al v. Santander Bank PR, et al
as 17-1808
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIOMEDES JIMENEZ-TAPIA, JOSE M. ALBANDOZ-RODRIGUEZ, EURIPIDES DEL VILLAR-ROSARIO
Defendant - Appellee: SANTANDER BANK PR, LUIS A. RAMIREZ-VICENS, individually and as president of Home Mortgage Bank Broker Corp, HOME MORTGAGE BANK BROKER CORP. and others
Dyer v. Roden
as 17-1796
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES DYER
Respondent - Appellee: GARY RODEN, Superintendent
US v. Severino-Pacheco
as 17-1806
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: FRANCISCO SEVERINO-PACHECO
Lee v. Grondolsky, et al
as 17-1795
Plaintiff - Appellant: WARREN ANTONIO LEE
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, Warden, OWENS, Mr., TAYLOR, Mr. and others
Spray v. Ryan
as 17-1814
Petitioner - Appellant: QUILLE MERLE SPRAY
Respondent - Appellee: KELLY A. RYAN, Superintendent of MCI - Shirley
RXDN, Inc., et al v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., et al
as 17-1776
Plaintiff - Appellant: RXDN, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similary situated, DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS CORPORATION
Vizcarrondo-Casanova v. US
as 17-1823
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSE VIZCARRONDO-CASANOVA
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES
US v. Pina
as 17-1813
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: ANGELO PINA
US v. Rachal
as 17-1788
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JOSEPH G. RACHAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?