U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 23,402
Da Silva Borges, et al v. Garland
as 24-1695
Petitioner:
ELIANE MARIA SILVA TEIXEIRA BORGES, DAVI LUCCA SILVA BORGES, ARTHUR SILVA BORGES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Briggs v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1692
Defendant:
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR - RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his Individual and Official Capacity, ROBERT CATLOW, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Chief Inspector, LINDA AMADO, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Administrator of Classification Service and others
Plaintiff:
SIMEON J. BRIGGS
Hodzic, et al v. Garland
as 24-1696
Petitioner:
REDZO HODZIC and EDINA HODZIC
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Drennen, et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
as 24-1677
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DRENNEN and UNITED STATES
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc.
Agut v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
AGUT DENG AGUT
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JOYCE, TOM KIMBER, JENNY GONZALEZ and others
Green Earth Energy Photovoltaic Corporation, et al v. Keybank National Association
as 24-1682
Interested Party:
MURPHY & KING, P.C., SPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB and STEPHEN B. DARR, Receiver of Green Earth Energy PhotoVoltaic Corp. and Green Earth Wamogo, LLC
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCYOCURKA, PAIGE SCYOCURKA and GREEN EARTH ENERGY PHOTOVOLTAIC CORPORATION
Defendant:
KEYBANK N.A., DOUG BEEBE and KEYCORP
Cross-Defendant:
GREEN EARTH WAMOGO, LLC
LaVallee v. Town of Dedham, et al
as 24-1644
Defendant:
DEDHAM, MA, MICHAEL J. WELCH, in their individual capacity, DEDHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Plaintiff:
THAD LAVALLEE
Acosta v. Crossroads, et al
as 24-1680
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ACOSTA
Defendant:
TRISTEL VELEZ and CROSSROADS, Travel Aid Housing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
