First Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,502
Lara v. USA
as 1:2024cv13215
Petitioner:
Francisco Araujo Lara
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Piard v. Hisman, et al
as 4:2024cv40168
Defendant:
Bethany Hisman and Anahory
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Lyft
as 4:2024cv40169
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Lyft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Vital Core et al
as 4:2024cv40170
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Pratt Crystal and Vital Core
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez-Serrano v. Escobar-Pabon, et al
as 24-2150
Respondent:
DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, ANA I. ESCOBAR-PABON and VICTOR MALDONADO, Warden
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS MELENDEZ-SERRANO
Smith v. Golden et al
as 1:2024cv13182
Defendant:
Matthew D Bober, Ryan T Matthews, Esq, Stephen Loesch, Esq and others
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. The Boston Herald et al
as 4:2024cv40164
Defendant:
Flint McColgan, The Boston Herald and Camilo Fonseca
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnard v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Respondent:
Maine, State of, Strafford County Department of Corrections, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey-Paul Barnard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Long v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00547
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jean Embrey, Officer Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Jamel Long and Jumel Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Duwayne Madison
Defendant:
Lt. Claros, Lynsey McNamara, Lynn Corry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
