First Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 538
GURNEY v. JOYCE
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN C GURNEY
Defendant:
KEVIN J JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Wilson M. Gonzales
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Richard Thompson, Rui Diniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Officer Munise
as 1:2024cv11381
Defendant:
Officer Munise
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Latham v. Officer Oneill et al
as 1:2024cv11318
Defendant:
Officer Oneill and Legal Mail Officer at Old Colony Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MacDougall v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2024cv11279
Plaintiff:
Mark MacDougall
Defendant:
Shawn P. Jenkins, Stephen Kennedy and Joy Gallant
Latham v. Officer Wyatt et al
as 1:2024cv11310
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Officer Wyatt and Inmate Canteen Office at Old Colony Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
HEACOX v. CASTONGUAY
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M HEACOX
Defendant:
BRYAN CASOWAY and BRYAN CASTONGUAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
