Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
GINO ROTONDO, SR. |
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity, PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, individual capacity, DR. DANIEL N. VALICENTI, individual capacity and official capacity, NURSE PRACTITIONER DAVE SASSO, individial capacity and official capacity, JOSEPH F. JANKOWSKI, individual capacity, KATHLEEN A LYONS, individual capacity, LT. RAFFERTY, individual capacity, LT. PERRY, individual capacity, MARYBETH, DR. SYNDER and JESSICA KEEFE |
24-1358 |
April 18, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE of unavailability of counsel from 07/01/2024 to 07/05/2024 filed by Attorney Marissa D. Pizana for Appellees Patricia Anne Coyne-Fague, Joseph F. Jankowski, Kimberly Kane, Kathleen A Lyons, Rafferty, Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Daniel N. Valicenti and Lori Ventituolo. Served on 04/19/2024. [24-1358] (MDP) [Entered: 04/19/2024 10:13 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Lori Ventituolo, Patricia Anne Coyne-Fague, Kathleen A Lyons, Joseph F. Jankowski, Rafferty, Dave Sasso, Daniel N. Valicenti and Kimberly Kane filed by Attorney Marissa Pizana. Served on 04/18/2024. [24-1358] (MDP) [Entered: 04/18/2024 04:24 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Dave Sasso filed by Attorney Christine A. Stowell. Served on 04/18/2024. [24-1358] (CAS) [Entered: 04/18/2024 04:24 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #64) filed by Appellant Gino Rotondo, Sr.. [24-1358] (ALW) [Entered: 04/18/2024 11:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.