District Court Cases in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 69,521
Campbell v. Francois et al
as 1:2024cv13128
Defendant:
Stephanie Monaghan O'Brien, Paul Fonteyne, Cedric Francois and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Campbell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Concord General Mutual Insurance Company v. Airise HVAC Design, Inc.
as 1:2024cv13125
Plaintiff:
Concord General Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Airise HVAC Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Fernandez et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2024cv13130
Plaintiff:
O.F. and Branden Fernandez
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Richards v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv13129
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS and Covidien, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ike Richards, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv13131
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Jones
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS and Covidien, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Caraway v. Sofradim Production SAS
as 1:2024cv13132
Plaintiff:
Dontay Caraway
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newland v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv13134
Plaintiff:
John Newland
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Godfrey v. Godfrey
as 1:2024cv13124
Plaintiff:
Anthony Godfrey
Defendant:
Thease Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv13135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv13121
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for writ of habeas corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
