District Court Cases in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Larsen v. Good Buy Gear, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv13414
Plaintiff:
Megan Larsen
Defendant:
Good Buy Gear, Inc. and Kristin Langenfeld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13417
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13415
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13418
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Pinckney v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC
as 1:2026cv13416
Plaintiff:
Jessica E. Pinckney
Defendant:
The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jordan v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.
as 1:2026cv13411
Plaintiff:
Cicely Jordan
Defendant:
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
SJ Medconnect, Inc. v. Liaison International, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv13412
Plaintiff:
SJ Medconnect, Inc. doing business as Thalamus
Defendant:
Liaison International, Inc. and Maya Hammoud
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13409
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13410
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
