District Court Cases in Rhode Island
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,331
Stevenson v. United Natural Foods, Inc.
as 1:2025cv00320
Plaintiff:
Brian Stevenson
Defendant:
United Natural Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jackson v. Bernard
as 1:2025cv00319
Plaintiff:
James W. A. Jackson
Defendant:
Karen Lynch Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker, Sr. v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2025cv00321
Plaintiff:
Deaven E. Tucker, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Albanese v. Lifespan Corporation et al
as 1:2025cv00316
Plaintiff:
Sarah Albanese
Defendant:
Lifespan Corporation doing business as Brown University Health and Rhode Island Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Szala v. City of East Providence et al
as 1:2025cv00315
Plaintiff:
Julie Szala
Defendant:
City of East Providence, Karen Moore, Laurie Marchand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2025cv00313
Plaintiff:
Michael Campbell
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
OneroRx, Inc. v. GoodRx, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv03025
Plaintiff:
OneroRx, Inc.
Defendant:
GoodRX Inc., GoodRx Holdings, Inc., CVS Caremark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
