First Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,190
F2VS Technologies, LLC v. AES Corporation
as 1:2018cv12567
Plaintiff:
F2VS Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
AES Corporation
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Pro Con Incorporated v. Northeast Pro-Con Solutions, LLC
as 1:2018cv01138
Defendant:
Northeast Pro-Con Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pro Con Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ecobee, Inc. v. EXPEDITED WAREHOUSE et al
as 1:2018cv12513
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, ACTION GEAR, MY FAST FILTERS
and others
Plaintiff:
ecobee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
RW IP Holdings, LLC v. Suki Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01131
Defendant:
Suki LLC, Suki Holdings LLC, Brian Dunham
and others
Plaintiff:
RW IP Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
SYMETRA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. EMERSON
as 2:2018cv00492
Plaintiff:
SYMETRA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GUY RAYMOND EMERSON
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
RICPI Communications LLC v. Simoco EMEA Ltd.
as 1:2018cv12469
Plaintiff:
RICPI Communications LLC
Defendant:
Simoco EMEA Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
AURITT v. AURITT et al
as 2:2018cv00471
Plaintiff:
GARY AURITT
Defendant:
SHANNON AURITT, KATHLEEN HAMILTON, TAKE A SHOWER LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. v. SUPER DISCOUNTS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv12375
Defendant:
Zhou Ming Zeng, SUPER DISCOUNTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. et al v. SHUN HAO GIFT SHOP LLC et al
as 1:2018cv12374
Defendant:
SHUN HAO GIFT SHOP LLC, SHUN LU ZHANG
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A., OAKLEY, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Excel Dryer, Inc. v. Penson & Co. LLC
as 3:2018cv30179
Defendant:
Penson & Co. LLC
Plaintiff:
Excel Dryer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
