First Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,779
BAGS LLC v. PICKLE JUICE COMPANY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
BAGS LLC
Defendant:
FILIP KEUPPENS and PICKLE JUICE COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
ZipBy USA LLC, et al v. Parzych
as 24-1586
Plaintiff:
ZIPBY USA LLC, TMA GROUP OF COMPANIES LIMITED and TMA CAPITAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Defendant:
GREGORY PARZYCH
Interested Party:
JENNIFER PROKOWIEW
Esquire Moving Inc. v. E Square Moving & Storage Inc.
as 1:2024cv11580
Plaintiff:
Esquire Moving Inc.
Defendant:
E Square Moving & Storage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Kellsport Industries, Inc. v. Eureka Chemical Company
as 1:2024cv11564
Plaintiff:
Kellsport Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Shenzhen Aji Fashion Technology Co. Ltd. v. WhaleCo Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11494
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Aji Fashion Technology Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Whaleco Inc., OYIJIA, ALUBO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
ZipBy USA LLC, et al v. Parzych
as 24-1500
Plaintiff:
TMA CAPITAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD, ZIPBY USA LLC and TMA GROUP OF COMPANIES LIMITED
Defendant:
GREGORY PARZYCH
Interested Party:
JENNIFER PROKOWIEW
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 1:2024cv11363
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-100, XYZ Company and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
ZipBy USA LLC, et al v. Parzych
as 24-1494
Plaintiff:
ZIPBY USA LLC, TMA CAPITAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD and TMA GROUP OF COMPANIES LIMITED
Interested Party:
JENNIFER PROKOWIEW
Defendant:
GREGORY PARZYCH
E.R. Enterprises, LLC v. Savr Restaurant LLC
as 1:2024cv11348
Defendant:
Savr Restaurant LLC
Plaintiff:
E.R Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
