District Court Cases in Maine
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,683
ROSS v. PIKE et al
as 1:2024cv00314
Defendant:
JOSHUA SOUCY, CODY HOUSTON, ADMINISTRATOR PIKE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILOGENE v. MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
JERRY PHILOGENE
Defendant:
MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER and WELLPATH
Unknown:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOLLEY v. SEBAGO et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Defendant:
BRADLEY PLANTE and TOWN OF SEBAGO
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOOLLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SMALL v. BINGHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00313
Defendant:
TOWN OF BINGHAM, STEVEN STEWARD and DEPUTY ASHLEY SMITH
Plaintiff:
DAIGAN C SMALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
EARLES v. SAGADAHOC COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES #1-5, SAGADAHOC COUNTY, WILLIAM FRITH and others
Plaintiff:
LATOYA EARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIGLIACCIO v. BANK
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
PAUL MIGLIACCIO
Defendant:
ALLY BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALLEGIANCE TRUCKS LLC v. DATTCO INC et al
as 2:2024cv00304
Defendant:
DATTCO INC and CRAIG SMITH
Plaintiff:
ALLEGIANCE TRUCKS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
JOHNSON v. WATERVILLE HEALTH & WELFARE
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
WATERVILLE HEALTH & WELFARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
