North Dakota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 353
Baasch v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Baasch
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Almer v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Almer
Defendant:
Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Softwho et al v. Microsoft Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Softwho and Mr. Joseph Andrew Stanford
Defendant:
Microsoft Incorporated, Cisco Systems Incorporated, IRS Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanderson
as 3:2024cv00022
Not Yet Classified:
Bev Demers
Petitioner:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Sanderson v. Myrdal
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Janne Myrdal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stanford v. Microsoft Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Stanford
Defendant:
Microsoft Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanderson v. Walsh County Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Walsh County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kolarik v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tyler Coy Kolarik
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Warren v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jesse Joseph Warren
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Ali v. AT and T et al
as 3:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jaami Ali
Defendant:
AT and T, T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile for Sprint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
