District Court Cases in North Dakota
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,466
Trehus v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00328
Plaintiff:
Tom Trehus
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bork v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00332
Plaintiff:
Peggi Bork
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walters v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Marlon Walters
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Leiss v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00323
Plaintiff:
Bruce Leiss
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gullickson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00318
Plaintiff:
Roger Gullickson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bodine v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00319
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bodine
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Enders v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00315
Plaintiff:
Mark Enders
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kraft v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00317
Plaintiff:
Nick Kraft
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Seifert v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00331
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Seifert
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brantl v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00343
Plaintiff:
Casey Brantl
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
