North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,142
Fraction v. Moorhead Police Department
as 3:2022cv00201
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Fraction
Defendant: Moorhead Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fruetel v. USA
as 1:2022cv00199
Petitioner: Travis John Fruetel
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Watley v. USA
as 1:2022cv00197
Petitioner: Michael David Watley
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Myers v. USA
as 1:2022cv00188
Petitioner: Yancey J. Myers
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reed v. USA
as 1:2022cv00182
Petitioner: Austin Wyatt Reed
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Adeyemo v. USA
as 3:2022cv00181
Petitioner: Michael Adefemi Adeyemo
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wilkinson v. Northeast Central District Court Clerk of Administration et al
as 3:2022cv00180
Plaintiff: Warren James Wilkinson, Sr.
Defendant: Northeast Central District Court Clerk of Administration, Judge John Thelen, Andrew Eyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00177
Petitioner: John Clark Bridges
Respondent: Director of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benter v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff: Dean Benter
Defendant: North Dakota, State of, Dept. of Corrections, Stephanie Keuhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Morse et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff: Dean Benter
Defendant: Doug Morse, Captain Ebach, Shannon Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?