District of North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 196
Sogge v. Pringle
as 3:2016cv00408
Petitioner: Bradley Sogge
Defendant: Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nygaard et al v. Taylor et al
as 3:2016cv00393
Petitioner: Aarin Nygaard , Terrance Stanley
Respondent: Tricia Taylor, Ted Taylor, Jr., Jessica Ducheneaux and others
Cause Of Action: Tribal Habeas Corpus
Robinson v. Colby Braun We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00361
Petitioner: Anthony James Robinson
Respondent: Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ourada v. Laney et al
as 3:2016cv00282
Petitioner: Joshua James Ourada
Respondent: Paul D. Laney, Hayena, Eric Benson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chisholm v. Braun We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00083
Petitioner: Rodney Chisholm
Respondent: Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chisholm v. Braun
as 1:2016cv00077
Petitioner: Rodney Ray Chisholm
Defendant: Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vogt v. Pringle
as 3:2016cv00065
Petitioner: Jason James Vogt
Respondent: Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curtiss v. Braun We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00049
Petitioner: Spencer Kerry Curtiss
Respondent: Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Pringle
as 3:2016cv00037
Petitioner: Charles William Russell, II
Respondent: Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DuBray v. Pringle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00029
Petitioner: Nathan G. DuBray
Respondent: Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?