Carlson v. Burdick
| Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson |
| Birch P. Burdick and Joseph Joyce |
| 1:2024cv00026 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Clare R Hochhalter |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER TO ANSWER AND CORRECT CAPTION by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (SG) Distributed on 2/28/2024. (jb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (SG) (Main Document 6 replaced on 2/23/2024 to correct a typographical error.) Regenerated NEF and Distributed on 2/23/2024. (jb)
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson. (jb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(jb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 2/26/2024. (cjs) |
| Filing 2 MOTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (State) by Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Letter to Clerk, #2 Mailing Envelope)(cjs) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Account, #2 Mailing Envelope)(cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
