North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 435
Abdikarim v. Lindstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Defendant:
Corwin Toyota of Fargo, Joshua Gregory Lindstrom and Adam Dean Elder
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdikarim v. State of North Dakota
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Jahner
as 3:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Sheriff Jesse Jahner
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdikarim v. Jahner et al
as 3:2024cv00165
Defendant:
Pete Nielsen, Sheriff Jesse Jahner, Kyle Hinrich and others
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Hinrich et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Defendant:
Kyle Hinrich, Derek Steiner and Reid Brady
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Emerson et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Ayannah Charette, Kent Cameron Carlson, City of Fargo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Defendant:
State of North Dakota and Cass County Courthouse
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Groth et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Defendant:
Officer Michael DiPalma, Officer Alek Groth, Jill Kristen Smithson and others
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Emerson et al
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Paul R. Emerson and Kimberly Higvick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Groth et al
as 3:2024cv00154
Defendant:
Officer Jack Krueger, Officer Alek Groth, Officer Michael DiPalma and others
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.