North Dakota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 642
Sanderson v. North Dakota Attorney General et al
as 3:2025cv00060
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
North Dakota Attorney General and Drew Wrigley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Treloar et al v. Packer et al
as 1:2025cv00057
Plaintiff:
Damon Treloar and Kala Burke
Defendant:
Officer Stephanie Packer, Officer Joshua McGoven, Officer Matthew Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sanderson v. ND Legislative Management Committee
as 3:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
ND Legislative Management Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanderson v. Flanders et al
as 3:2025cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Michelle Flanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanderson v. Jurgens
as 3:2025cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Ron Jurgens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanderson v. Agotness
as 3:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Kari Agotness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maixner et al v. Eidsness et al
as 3:2025cv00038
Plaintiff:
Loralyn Maixner, Wayne Maixner, Ron Maixner and others
Defendant:
Harold Eidsness, Cody Johnson, Aaron Mork and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
