Almer v. Hanson et al
| Travis Scott Almer |
| Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin and Cass County |
| 3:2024cv00029 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Alice R Senechal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cass County, Ronald Kind, Justin Hanson, Laif Rognlin. All Defendants. (Gaustad, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel L. Gaustad on behalf of All Defendants (Gaustad, Daniel) |
Filing 6
(Text Only) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Eric Rice. (sc)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Attorney Eric Aron Rice (Filing fee $150, receipt number ANDDC-2853728) by Travis Scott Almer. (Rice, Eric) Modified to add receipt number on 2/29/2024 (sc). |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Travis Scott Almer. (sc) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Cass County, Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin. (sc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Travis Scott Almer. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 3/5/2024. (sc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cass County, Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin (Filing fee $405, receipt number 300000780) filed by Travis Scott Almer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
