Montana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 921
Vanwell v. Prairie County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Vanwell
Defendant:
Prairie County Sheriff's Office, Prairie Community Hospital, Prairie County Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Pham v. Smith et al
as 1:2025cv00020
Plaintiff:
Hoang Vinh Pham
Defendant:
Richard Smith, Department of Criminal Investigations, Brandon Kelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wang v. AT&T et al
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant:
AT&T and Snowflake Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brien v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv00012
Plaintiff:
Ben Brien
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Yost v. Acting Warden McNeil et al
as 6:2025cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Yost
Defendant:
Acting Warden McNeil, Brian Gootkin and MSP High Side Unit Manager Cornelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rolfs v. City of Great Falls et al
as 4:2025cv00007
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rolfs
Defendant:
City of Great Falls, Lance Souza, Josh Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Bradley Culbreath v. Granite County et al
as 9:2025cv00013
Plaintiff:
Estate of Bradley Culbreath
Defendant:
Granite County and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Musk et al
as 1:2025cv00008
Defendant:
Mike Johnson, Elon Musk, Department of Government Efficiency and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Casazza v. Court Judge
as 9:2025cv00001
Defendant:
Court Judge
Plaintiff:
Armand Joseph Casazza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Workers Comp
as 9:2025cv00002
Defendant:
Workers Comp
Plaintiff:
Mckaynel J Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.