District of Montana Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 857
Breck et al v. Stapleton
as 9:2017cv00036
Plaintiff: Thomas Breck , Danielle Breck , Steve Kelly
Defendant: Corey Stapleton
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Russo v. Yellowstone County et al
as 1:2017cv00038
Defendant: Yellowstone County , Brian Degele , City of Billings and others
Plaintiff: Patricia L Russo-Wood
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00019
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Sadler v. Dutton
as 9:2017cv00026
Plaintiff: Timothy Ray Sadler
Defendant: Sheriff Dutton
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2017cv00025
Plaintiff: Kendall Ray Williams
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Brandon Watters
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Macioroski v. Vincent et al
as 2:2017cv00010
Plaintiff: Robert A. Macioroski
Defendant: Matt Vincent, The City and County of Butte-Silver Bow, John and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Marten v. Justad, M.D. et al
as 6:2017cv00031
Plaintiff: Ellen Marten
Defendant: Jean Justad, M.D. , South Hills Internal Medicine Associates , Gene Haire and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Victory Processing et al v. Fox
as 6:2017cv00027
Plaintiff: Victory Processing , Dave Dishaw
Defendant: Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Poulson et al v. City of Billings et al
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff: Kermit Ty Poulson, The People, Laurie Williams and others
Defendant: City of Billings, Burger King, Tina Volek and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
BEH Gaming, Ltd. et al v. Schmockel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00008
Plaintiff: BEH Gaming, Ltd. , NORAM-BEH, LLC , NORAM, LLC
Defendant: Tanya Schmockel, Caryn Sangrey, Misty Denny and others
Cause Of Action: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?